<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do creeps objectify Amanda online?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/</link>
	<description>Taming the bizarre for normal people to enjoy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 08:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>thats some deep shit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats some deep shit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>thats some deep shit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats some deep shit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-183</guid>
		<description>thats some deep shit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats some deep shit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creep</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Creep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-182</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a beautiful girl Amanda but things will never work out for us. I&#039;m sorry. It&#039;s not you, it&#039;s me. I&#039;ve been tempted by the fruit of another. And her name is Part Time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sarah, you&#039;re the star of this show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re a beautiful girl Amanda but things will never work out for us. I&#39;m sorry. It&#39;s not you, it&#39;s me. I&#39;ve been tempted by the fruit of another. And her name is Part Time.</p>
<p>Sarah, you&#39;re the star of this show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-179</guid>
		<description>I just got here from that link on Playboy, and I frankly haven&#039;t seen much of what you have done since Rocketbook and that one time when you got hit with a taser. So I think the publicity is probably a good thing for you, all things considered.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would point out that the desire for men to want to see an attractivel woman, and moreover see that woman naked, is a natural biological imperative that drives our species forward, and is to be anticipated and expected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Similarly, I read recently that a picture of a smiling baby causes women&#039;s brains to flood with dopamine -- much like the reaction one gets from taking cocaine, or that men have when viewing pornography. Biological imperative stuff. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So do Mom&#039;s who want to see pictures of smiling babies &quot;objectify&quot; babies? Are they creepy?  And do parents who let their kids be photographed participate in this economy cater to that need and objectify them?  Absolutely --  Take Brooke Shields for example, who went from an objectified baby model to an objectified Calvin Klein model. Same deal, different biological imperative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reality is that Entertainment &quot;objectifies&quot; everything in the literal sense ... in the sense that we take individuals and turn them into a product -- an object to be consumed. In your case, a  pretty woman journalist/blogger, you are already an object -- the question remains what kind of object you choose to be. That men would prefer you to be a certain kind of object is totally natural, to be expected, and in no way creepy. What may be creepy are the people who will try to manipulate you to cater to that need (Fashion photographers, pornographers, etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got here from that link on Playboy, and I frankly haven&#39;t seen much of what you have done since Rocketbook and that one time when you got hit with a taser. So I think the publicity is probably a good thing for you, all things considered.</p>
<p>I would point out that the desire for men to want to see an attractivel woman, and moreover see that woman naked, is a natural biological imperative that drives our species forward, and is to be anticipated and expected.</p>
<p>Similarly, I read recently that a picture of a smiling baby causes women&#39;s brains to flood with dopamine &#8212; much like the reaction one gets from taking cocaine, or that men have when viewing pornography. Biological imperative stuff. </p>
<p>So do Mom&#39;s who want to see pictures of smiling babies &#8220;objectify&#8221; babies? Are they creepy?  And do parents who let their kids be photographed participate in this economy cater to that need and objectify them?  Absolutely &#8212;  Take Brooke Shields for example, who went from an objectified baby model to an objectified Calvin Klein model. Same deal, different biological imperative.</p>
<p>The reality is that Entertainment &#8220;objectifies&#8221; everything in the literal sense &#8230; in the sense that we take individuals and turn them into a product &#8212; an object to be consumed. In your case, a  pretty woman journalist/blogger, you are already an object &#8212; the question remains what kind of object you choose to be. That men would prefer you to be a certain kind of object is totally natural, to be expected, and in no way creepy. What may be creepy are the people who will try to manipulate you to cater to that need (Fashion photographers, pornographers, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YT</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>YT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Yeah, we&#039;re looking at you Gawker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, we&#39;re looking at you Gawker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: draiocht</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>draiocht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Sexism/racism prevalence in the media may be difficult to discern -- bias causing stories to be dropped and similar situations of missing information aren&#039;t readily noticeable. However, sexism has certainly been very blatant.  I&#039;ve noticed several organizations putting together videos of the more conspicuous examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sexism/racism prevalence in the media may be difficult to discern &#8212; bias causing stories to be dropped and similar situations of missing information aren&#39;t readily noticeable. However, sexism has certainly been very blatant.  I&#39;ve noticed several organizations putting together videos of the more conspicuous examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atomic elroy</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>atomic elroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-180</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an art pig... &lt;br&gt;oink oink...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m an art pig&#8230; <br />oink oink&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amandacongdon</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>amandacongdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Ironically, I have just been featured on a Playboy list of bloggers you want to see naked. Please know that unlike most of the bloggers on the list I did NOT consent to being on it and I will certainly NOT pose naked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, I have just been featured on a Playboy list of bloggers you want to see naked. Please know that unlike most of the bloggers on the list I did NOT consent to being on it and I will certainly NOT pose naked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leron</title>
		<link>http://sometimesdaily.com/2008/07/do-creeps-objectify-amanda-online/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>leron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sometimesdaily.com/?p=53#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Men are pigs. And hey, some of my best friends are men. But they&#039;re still pigs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have seen dozens, if not hundreds, of attractive Internet and TV hosts of both genders. Most are interchangeable are rarely missed when they move on. What sets you apart, Amanda, is your intelligence and your wit. (And your willingness to take the occasional Taser hit.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the Internets spawn a large audience who are either 14 years old or regress to that state, secure in what they believe is their anonymity behind handles like &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:xxxsexdude@yahoo.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;xxxsexdude@yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;. It is sad but inevitable that they will react in certain ways. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even more sad, I think they are simply giving voice to feelings that most guys walk around with pretty much all the time but do not dare express. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chalk it up to genetics, or the coarse culture, or hormones in beef, or whatever. It will be a while before we move forward. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, I remain hopeful. We&#039;re gonna have a black guy for a president soon. And much of the criticism of Hillary (though certainly not all) focused not on her gender or her wardrobe, but on her policy positions and unscrupulous politicking. A mere 24 years ago Geraldine Ferraro never got past, &quot;Can you make a blueberry muffin?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men are pigs. And hey, some of my best friends are men. But they&#39;re still pigs. </p>
<p>I have seen dozens, if not hundreds, of attractive Internet and TV hosts of both genders. Most are interchangeable are rarely missed when they move on. What sets you apart, Amanda, is your intelligence and your wit. (And your willingness to take the occasional Taser hit.) </p>
<p>But the Internets spawn a large audience who are either 14 years old or regress to that state, secure in what they believe is their anonymity behind handles like <a href="mailto:xxxsexdude@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">xxxsexdude@yahoo.com</a>. It is sad but inevitable that they will react in certain ways. </p>
<p>Even more sad, I think they are simply giving voice to feelings that most guys walk around with pretty much all the time but do not dare express. </p>
<p>Chalk it up to genetics, or the coarse culture, or hormones in beef, or whatever. It will be a while before we move forward. </p>
<p>Still, I remain hopeful. We&#39;re gonna have a black guy for a president soon. And much of the criticism of Hillary (though certainly not all) focused not on her gender or her wardrobe, but on her policy positions and unscrupulous politicking. A mere 24 years ago Geraldine Ferraro never got past, &#8220;Can you make a blueberry muffin?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

